Imagine: the whole family is gather for a pleasant Sunday brunch in grandma and grandpa’s spacious garden. The adults are sitting and talking, the children are playing together on the lawn, and one of the children comes running to their mother with beautifully braided meadow flowers in her hair. They might also want to share it with friends or family members who couldn’t make it. So the photos and videos are quickly shared in chat rooms and on social media . But caution is advised here, because children also have a right to their own image , and once published, images are difficult to remove from the internet. The right to be forgotten under Art. 17 of the GDPR is thus effectively render meaningless, and the so-called household privilege for family and personal activities is also abandoned, which defines an exception to the GDPR and its consequences.
Sharenting and its consequences
A new term has emerged for the phenomenon of parents posting and blogging about their children’s entire lives: sharenting . A combination of the usa business fax list English words “parenting” and “share.” And this is happening more and more frequently. As the State Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information. North Rhine-Westphalia (LDI NRW) report in its 27th annual report for the period from January 1 to December 31, 2021. Parents have absolutely no malicious intent. Rather, it’s perfectly understandable that you want to let other people share in the beautiful and funny moments of your family life. At this point, however, you should consider what your child would say if they realiz that their entire life was being shar with God and the world.
Children are denied a say
Aside from the rights to one’s own image and. Self-determination that must be consider, what is mobile commerce and why is it all anyone talks about? there are also some more abstract. Dangers that are not readily comprehensible, especially for younger children. Therefore must be consider by parents. Therefore, a child’s consent should not automatically be interpret as meaning that publication is appropriate.
The potential for abuse on the Internet is huge
In the context of cyberbullying, images published online can be us to cause great harm. This doesn’t even have to be particularly embarrassing, email data as even seemingly harmless images can be used. For example, through post-processing, to expose someone.
Unfortunately, images of babies in diapers, children in pajamas. Tenagers in swimwear are all too often abus in sexualized contexts. Perpetrators with a sexual interest in children specifically search for such images online to make them available to like-minded individuals. While this poses no direct physical danger to the children, neither parents nor children likely want their images to be abused in this context.